Torts and Innovation

Document Type



107 Michigan Law Review 285 (2008)


This Essay exposes and analyzes a hitherto overlooked cost of the current design of tort law: its adverse effect on innovation. Tort liability for negligence, defective products, and medical malpractice is determined by reference to custom. We demonstrate that courts’ reliance on custom and conventional technologies as the benchmark of liability chills innovation and distorts its path. Specifically, the recourse to custom taxes innovators and subsidizes replicators of conventional technologies. We explore the causes and consequences of this phenomenon and propose two possible ways to modify tort law in order to make it more welcoming to innovation.

Date of Authorship for this Version

October 2008


law & technology, science & technology, torts, evidence, innovation, negligence, products liability, medical malpractice, custom