Michael Alvarez and Bernard Grofman (eds), Election Administration in the United States: The State of Reform After Bush v. Gore, forthcoming from Cambridge University Press.
This essay provides a look at the legal landscape regarding the right to vote that has emerged in the wake of the 2012 elections. Courts have begun using Bush v. Gore to craft an intermediate form of equal protection scrutiny to address barriers to voting or the manipulation of voting requirements when the state’s justifications for these constraints are thin or unconvincing. The essay also focuses on the emergence of Early Voting as a central feature of current democratic participation and the ways in which courts have begun to understand Early Voting as a legal category. The essay serves as an epilogue to a social science volume on voting reform edited by Michael Alvarez and Bernard Grofman, Election Administration in the United States: The State of Reform After Bush v. Gore. The essay ends with a tentative assessment of the emerging new equal protection jurisprudence.
Date of Authorship for this Version
Issacharoff, Samuel and Pildes, Richard H., "Epilogue: Bush v. Gore and the Constitutional Right to Vote" (2013). New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. 381.