masthead


  NELLCO Repository Home

Customized Email Alerts by Subject Area

Search

My Account

NELLCO Home



poweredbybepress

 

   logo
Yale Law School

Available Papers  •  Yale Law School Web Site  •  Search the Collection  •  Policies
NELLCO LSR > YALE > LEPP bealert

Royalties for Artists Versus Royalties for Authors and Composers
Henry Hansmann, Yale Law School

Download the Paper (PDF format) - April 11, 2001 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
Legislation creating or reinforcing resale royalties for visual artists retains substantial political popularity, particularly in the European Union -- despite the often skeptical attitude toward those rights in the economics literature. In this essay, we probe more deeply the affirmative arguments that can be made for a resale royalty right, in either a mandatory or a discretionary form. We also compare the rationale for visual artists’ resale royalties with the potential rationales for the now-well-established systems of royalty rights for authors and composers. This comparison has particular interest both because some of the principal arguments made against visual artists’ resale royalties also apply to authors’ royalties, and because the economic rationale for compensating authors with royalties has itself not been well explored. We also discuss briefly the related subject of display rights for visual artists. We conclude with some general implications for policy.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Henry Hansmann, "Royalties for Artists Versus Royalties for Authors and Composers" (April 11, 2001). Yale Law School. Yale Law School John M. Olin Center for Studies in Law, Economics, and Public Policy Working Paper Series. Paper 250.
http://lsr.nellco.org/yale/lepp/papers/250




REPOSITORY HOME  | SEARCH  | MY ACCOUNT  | NELLCO HOME |
Powered by bepress.