<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Vermont Law School Faculty Papers</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 NELLCO All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://lsr.nellco.org/vermontlaw_fp</link>
<description>Recent documents in Vermont Law School Faculty Papers</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:37:24 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF CRITICAL HABITAT LITIGATION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT </title>
<link>http://lsr.nellco.org/vermontlaw_fp/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lsr.nellco.org/vermontlaw_fp/1</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 12:31:21 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>As Congress considers amendments to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), one of the most contentious issues to be resolved involves the designation of critical habitat for listed species. At this point, the first wave of critical habitat lawsuits filed by environmental groups has essentially run its course, and has been replaced by a second emergent wave of industry lawsuits seeking to rescind critical habitat designations.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Patrick Parenteau</author>


<category>Environmental Law</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>
