Title

Shoot to Stun

Document Type

Article

Comments

NY Times, op-ed, July 2, 2008

Abstract

This New York Times op-ed piece argues that the recent Heller opinion, recognizing a constitutional right under the Second Amendment for a person to hold a loaded firearm in their house, does not have the broad practical implications for greater firearm use that many people seem to assume. It is the criminal law in each state that controls the use a firearm for defensive force, not the Second Amendment, and those provisions uniformly limit defensive firearm use in dramatic ways. Indeed, as non-lethal weapons become more effective and more available, the use of firearms, which by law constitute lethal force, become increasingly less justifiable under current law.

Available for download at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1175283

Date of Authorship for this Version

July 2008

Keywords

self-defense, non-lethal weapons, criminal law

This document is currently not available here.
COinS