Document Type
Article
Comments
25 Behavioral Sciences and the Law 203–220 (Mar./Apr. 2007).
Abstract
This article demonstrates that there is no free will problem in forensic psychiatry by showing that free will or its lack is not a criterion for any legal doctrine and it is not an underlying general foundation for legal responsibility doctrines and practices. There is a genuine metaphysical free will problem, but the article explains why it is not relevant to forensic practice. Forensic practitioners are urged to avoid all usage of free will in their forensic thinking and work product because it is irrelevant and spawns confusion.
Date of Authorship for this Version
March 2007
Keywords
free will, reason, forensic psychiatry and psychology, criminal responsibility, excuse, mental health laws, law and philosophy, determinism, incompatibilism, compatibilism
Recommended Citation
Morse, Stephen, "The Non-Problem of Free Will in Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology" (2007). Scholarship at Penn Law. Paper 157.
http://lsr.nellco.org/upenn_wps/157
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Psychology and Psychiatry Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons