masthead


  NELLCO Repository Home

Customized Email Alerts by Subject Area

Search

My Account

NELLCO Home



poweredbybepress

 

logo

Available Papers  •  University of Pennsylvania Law School Web Site  •  Search the Collection  •  Policies
NELLCO LSR > UPENN > WPS bealert

Cultural Communities in a Global Labor Market: Immigration Restrictions as Residential Segregation
Howard F. Chang, University of Pennsylvania Law School

2007 University of Chicago Legal Forum (forthcoming 2007)

Download the Paper (PDF format) - May 2, 2007 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
Economists recognize that nations can gain from trade through not only the free movement of goods across national boundaries but also the free movement of services, capital, and labor across national boundaries. Despite the presumption that economic theory raises in favor of international labor mobility, the nations of the world maintain restrictions on immigration and show little inclination to liberalize these barriers significantly. Michael Walzer defends immigration restrictions as policies necessary to maintain distinct cultural communities and rejects the alternative of voluntary residential segregation at the local level. I argue that we should instead prefer voluntary segregation at the local level over segregation mandated by the government at the national level. Segregation at the local level allows individuals to enjoy the benefits of living in a community matching their preferences while still enjoying access to labor markets in other communities nearby. The type of segregation that Walzer defends, enforced at the national level through immigration restrictions, cuts workers off from valuable employment opportunities. First, I present a critique of Walzer’s claims from an economic perspective. I take the maximization of global economic welfare to be the appropriate objective, then explore whether the value of distinctive cultural communities can justify immigration restrictions. Second, I present a moral critique from a liberal perspective. I argue that even if immigration restrictions satisfy the preferences of incumbent residents for more extensive segregation than voluntary segregation can provide, this effect cannot justify immigration restrictions in a society committed to liberal ideals.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Howard F. Chang, "Cultural Communities in a Global Labor Market: Immigration Restrictions as Residential Segregation" (May 2, 2007). University of Pennsylvania Law School. Scholarship at Penn Law. Paper 90.
http://lsr.nellco.org/upenn/wps/papers/90




REPOSITORY HOME  | SEARCH  | MY ACCOUNT  | NELLCO HOME |
Powered by bepress.