Pierce Law Faculty Scholarship Series
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Recently, the Supreme Court sent Dennison Mfg. V. Panduit Corp. back to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). It remanded with explicit directions that the lower court consider the extent to which Rule 52(a) governs appellate review of determinations of obviousness.
Date of Authorship for this Version
January 1986
Recommended Citation
Field, Thomas G. Jr, "Law and Fact in Patent Litigation: Form Versus Function" (1986). Pierce Law Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 27.
http://lsr.nellco.org/piercelaw_facseries/27