New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This essay argues that the doctrinal concept of law is unnecessary. Traditional accounts of the concept of law hold that public officials and citizens undertake a two-step protocol in their practical reasoning. Each first determines what the law requires and then assesses whether her other reasons for actions dictate a different decision. One can, however, replace these two-step protocols with a one-step protocol that globally assesses all reasons for action without making the intermediate determination of what the law requires.

Dworkin, in his philosophy of law, essentially takes this position with respect to judges. He reduces the two-step protocol to a one-step protocol. He may thus be viewed as a proto-elminitavist.

Date of Authorship for this Version

8-2015

Keywords

concept of law, eliminativism, Hart-Dworkin debate

Included in

Jurisprudence Commons

Share

COinS