Claims about social and economic rights (as a kind of human right) are often criticized because they fail to specify who are the bearers of the corresponding duties. We usually say that states are the duty-bearers, but it may not be possible for a poor state to bear the burden of these rights. And anyway it may be a mistake to focus exclusively on states in an age of globalization. This paper uses some analytic ideas from the 1970s and 1980s to address this problem. Drawing on the work of Neil MacCormick and Joseph Raz, it argues that it is possible to specify a right without specifying duty-bearers; that a right is a reason to look for duty-bearers in regard to a particular interest; that there may be many duty-bearers in regard to a given right; and that who bears the duty corresponding to a given right may vary by time and circumstance.
Date of Authorship for this Version
dutys, globalization, human rights, interest theory of rights, MacCormick, practicability, Raz, rights, social and economic rights
Waldron, Jeremy, "Duty-bearers for Positive Rights" (2014). New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. Paper 497.
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Education Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, Legislation Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Rule of Law Commons, Social Welfare Law Commons