81 Fordham Law Review 3213 (2013)
This Essay confronts the idea of the “helpless” group—that is, the group comprising individuals who are thought to be incapable of protecting their own interests. That idea plays an important role in the history of the modern class action, which has been justified as a device providing redress for “small claims held by small people.” The rhetoric of helplessness did not begin with the class action. Instead, the concern about helpless individuals corralled into a group and preyed upon by their adversaries (and their own lawyers) originated in the world of business bankruptcy before it made its way to the world of the class action. The Essay traces the history of the helpless group in business bankruptcy cases and describes the influence of that history on the development of the modern class action. Bankruptcy, however, has shifted away from the perception that claimants are helpless to protect themselves in the process—a shift that explains the creation of committees and other forms of group representation in modern Chapter 11 practice. The Essay considers whether similar forms of group representation may serve a role in aggregate litigation outside the class action.
Date of Authorship for this Version
McKenzie, Troy A., ""HELPLESS" GROUPS" (2013). New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. Paper 425.
Administrative Law Commons, Bankruptcy Law Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Civil Procedure Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, Courts Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Legal History Commons, Legal Profession Commons, Litigation Commons, Organizations Law Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons