Julius Stone Address, August 3, 2006
This paper -- presented originally as the Julius Stone lecture at the University of Sydney (Australia) in 2006 -- considers the application of the thesis of "supersession of historic injustice" to issues of sovereignty. The supersession thesis has ben applied in the past to historic injustice concerning land and property rghts in formler colonial contexts; but it may also be applied to the historic legacy of the unjust subjugation of a people. It considers and criticizes reversion theories, which suggest that the proper remedy for unjust subjugation is some sort of reversion to the politcal status quo ante. The paper argues that this cannot be entertained without considering the great differences in statecraft and political circumstances that may have emerged since the time of the unjust subjugation. Those considerations may affect the way we apply the principle of self-determination to these contexts.
Date of Authorship for this Version
aboriginal rights, Australia, autonomy, historic injustice, indigenous peoples, New Zealand, political development, reversion, self-determination, self-government, sovereignty, state
Waldron, Jeremy, "Supersession and Sovereignty" (2006). New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. Paper 406.
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Rule of Law Commons