Tax Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2015
In the Conclusion to Capital in the Twenty-First Century Thomas Piketty issues a call for a political and historical economics. Like Marx and the political economists before him, Piketty is interested in how markets work because he is interested in the rights and wrongs of institutional, especially legal, design. His is book is guided by a clear sense that economic inequality, especially inequality of wealth, raises serious prima facie problems of social justice. This essay is a critical investigation into the political morality underlying Capital in the Twenty-First Century that unravels and evaluates the different ways in which economic inequality may or may not matter.
Date of Authorship for this Version
inequality, Piketty, social justice
Murphy, Liam B., "Why Does Inequality Matter? Reflections on the Political Morality of Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century" (2016). New York University Law and Economics Working Papers. Paper 440.
Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Taxation-Federal Commons, Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift Commons, Taxation-State and Local Commons, Taxation-Transnational Commons