Document Type

Article

Comments

Forthcoming, McGill Law Journal, Volume 55

Abstract

Canadian courts have shown an interest in abandoning the common law’s traditional rule against enforcing penalty clauses and instead analyzing those clauses through the lens of the doctrine of unconscionability. The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Birch v. Union of Taxation Employees, Local 70030 adopts this approach. However, in doing so the majority missed several opportunities to use unconscionability doctrine to examine features of the case that would have been ignored under the penalty doctrine.

Date of Authorship for this Version

4-15-2009

Included in

Contracts Commons

Share

COinS