Document Type

Article

Comments

Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 39, pp. 201-244, 2010

Abstract

No large-scale empirical study on condemnation compensation has been done in the past thirty years. Yet several state legislatures, in response to the Kelo case, have changed laws to increase condemnation compensation, despite the lack of empirical grounds. To fill in the empirical gap, I use hedonic regression models and about 80,000 sales to estimate the fair market value (FMV) of condemned properties whose owners reached compensation settlements with the condemnor, New York City, between 1990 and 2002. More than 50% of these condemnees were compensated with less than FMV; about 40% received more than FMV; and less than 10% got FMV. Owners of residential properties and non-residential properties alike often received extreme compensations that are less than 50%, or more than 150%, of FMV. Condemnor's political interests and condemnees' ignorance of estimated FMV are the most likely explanations. Compensation level does not correlate with any factor with available data.

Date of Authorship for this Version

11-13-2008

Share

COinS