masthead


  NELLCO Repository Home

Customized Email Alerts by Subject Area

Search

My Account

NELLCO Home



poweredbybepress

 

   logo
New York University School of Law

Available Papers  •  New York University School of Law Web Site  •  Search the Collection  •  Policies
NELLCO LSR > NYU > PLLTWP bealert

THE EFFECTS OF JURY IGNORANCE ABOUT DAMAGE CAPS: THE CASE OF THE 1991 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff, New York University School of Law
Matthew T. Bodie, Hofstra University School of Law

Forthcoming in Iowa Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 4, 2005

Download the Paper (PDF format) - March 4, 2005 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
The 1991 Civil Rights Act revolutionized employment discrimination litigation by allowing for compensatory and punitive damages. At the same time, however, the Act capped those damages and forbade courts from informing jurors about the cap. This Article explores the effects of this imposed secrecy on the jury deliberation process and on the jury system itself. First, our article delves into the wealth of psychological literature about jury decision-making to determine how disclosing or hiding the caps might affect the jury’s damage calculations. We explore decision-making biases and heuristics that might systematically affect the jurors’ judgment about damage awards, and discuss how those awards might be changed if jurors were informed of the caps. Second, we discuss the potential effects that such secrecy has on perceptions of the legitimacy and fairness of the jury system, through its impact on parties, attorneys, and jurors. We conclude, in light of relevant psychological literature, that disclosure of the caps is likely to affect the jury’s decision-making process, but that non-disclosure has the potential to threaten the integrity of the jury system more broadly, because hiding the caps could result in a failure of procedural justice that would affect the integrity of the judicial process. Ultimately, we argue that disclosing the caps, particularly if included within a framework of additional information about the purpose of compensatory and punitive damages, would result in better jury awards and more public satisfaction with the judicial system.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff and Matthew T. Bodie, "THE EFFECTS OF JURY IGNORANCE ABOUT DAMAGE CAPS: THE CASE OF THE 1991 CIVIL RIGHTS ACT" (March 4, 2005). New York University School of Law. New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. Paper 2.
http://lsr.nellco.org/nyu/plltwp/papers/2




REPOSITORY HOME  | SEARCH  | MY ACCOUNT  | NELLCO HOME |
Powered by bepress.