masthead


  NELLCO Repository Home

Customized Email Alerts by Subject Area

Search

My Account

NELLCO Home



poweredbybepress

 

   logo
New York University School of Law

Available Papers  •  New York University School of Law Web Site  •  Search the Collection  •  Policies
NELLCO LSR > NYU > PLLTWP bealert

Comparative Law at the Service of Democracy: A Reading of Arosemena's Constitutional Studies of the Latin American Governments
Miguel Gonzalez Marcos

21 Boston University International Law Journal 259 (2003)

Download the Paper (PDF format) - January 1, 2006 Tell a colleague about it.
Printing Tips: Select 'print as image' in the Acrobat print dialog if you have trouble printing.

ABSTRACT:
In 1870, Justo Arosemena published Constitutional Studies of the Governments of Latin America in France. Arosemena wanted to promote a constitutional harmonization of the Latin American legal orders. He thought a harmonization would make it easier for a citizen of a Latin American country to enjoy similar rights in any Latin American country. Once the Latin American harmonization was completed, Arosemena hoped that an integration of the American continent would be possible. A utopian ideal of a universal society nourished Arosemena’s work. He believed that in the future, humanity would be organized in small cities linked through morality, economy, culture, and science. No more a source of national identity, the state would guarantee fundamental rights to every person, irrespective of nationality. Yet, the realities of the 19th and 20th centuries challenged Arosemena’s vision. Readily dismissible as utopian, Constitutional Studies was forgotten. Still, there is a good reason for reexamining Constitutional Studies anew. Globalization, a third wave of increasing world integration, is bringing comparative constitutional law to the foreground. A reading of Constitutional Studies may contribute to thinking about the limits and possibilities of comparative constitutional law now. Indeed, Constitutional Studies is both an attempt to coordinate constitutional law to promote integration and an attempt to develop a transnational constitutional discourse. This study will show Arosemena’s main contribution to comparative constitutional law.

SUGGESTED CITATION:
Miguel Gonzalez Marcos, "Comparative Law at the Service of Democracy: A Reading of Arosemena's Constitutional Studies of the Latin American Governments" (January 1, 2006). New York University School of Law. New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. Paper 15.
http://lsr.nellco.org/nyu/plltwp/papers/15




REPOSITORY HOME  | SEARCH  | MY ACCOUNT  | NELLCO HOME |
Powered by bepress.