Authors

Roger I. Abrams

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This article addresses the historical anomaly of baseball's exemption from the federal antitrust laws. Starting with Justice Holmes' opinion in the 1922 Federal Baseball case, the article criticizes the Supreme Court's rigid adherence to stare decisis despite considerable changes in the legal and economic context. Ultimately, in the Curt Flood case the Court acknowledges the error of its previous ways, but stubbornly refuses to correct the law, leaving to Congress the ultimate power to revise a half century of judicial errors.

Date of Authorship for this Version

1-1-1999

Keywords

Baseball, Antitrust law, Justice Holmes, stare decisis, Curt Flood, Supreme Court, Congress, Entertainment and Sports Law, Law

Original Citation

Originally published in Marquette Sports Law Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 307-313, Spring 1999. Marquette University Law School retains copyright.

Share

COinS