Document Type
Article
Abstract
We view a contract as a list of outcomes. Ex ante, the parties commit not to consider outcomes not on the list, i.e., these are "ruled out". Ex post, they freely bargain over outcomes on the list, i.e., the contract specifies no mechanism to structure their choice; in this sense outcomes on the list are not "ruled in". A "loose" contract (long list) maximizes flexibility but may interfere with ex ante investment incentives. When these incentives are important enough, the parties may write a "tight" contract (short list), even though this leads to ex post inefficiency.
Date of Authorship for this Version
March 2004
Recommended Citation
Hart, Oliver and Moore, John, "Agreeing Now to Agree Later: Contracts That Rule Out But Do Not Rule In" (2004). Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business Discussion Paper Series. Paper 465.
http://lsr.nellco.org/harvard_olin/465