Which States Have the Best (and Worst) High Courts?
The most up-to-date version of this piece can be found in the Duke Law Scholarship
John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 405
This paper ranks the high courts of the fifty states, based on their performance during the years 1998-2000, along three dimensions: opinion quality (or influence as measured by out-of-state citations), independence (or non-partisanship), and productivity (opinions written). We also discuss ways of aggregating these measures. California and Delaware had the most influential courts; Georgia and Mississippi had the most productive courts; and Rhode Island and New York had the most independent courts. If equal weight is given to each measure, then the top five states were: California, Arkansas, North Dakota, Montana, and Ohio. We compare our approach and results with those of other scholars and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, whose influential rankings are based on surveys of lawyers at big corporations.
Date of Authorship for this Version
state courts, high courts, court performance
Choi, Stephen J.; Gulati, Mitu; and Posner, Eric A., "Which States Have the Best (and Worst) High Courts?" (2008). Duke Law School Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 168.