Boston College Law School Faculty Papers
Title
Idea or Practice: A Brief Historiography of Judicial Review
Document Type
Article
Comments
Forthcoming in Journal of Policy History, vol. 20, no. 1 (2008), pp. 6-26.
Abstract
Judicial review may be the most publicly contested aspect of American constitutionalism. The conventional beliefs that judicial review should be understood as an idea and American constitutionalism studied as a new rationalistic, political science are largely due to the influential scholarship of Edward Corwin. This brief essay recovers the pre-Corwin discussion about the origins of judicial review to demonstrate the way in which the approach to judicial review as an idea has been, itself, historically constructed by scholarly inclination, disciplinary identification, and the availability of historical materials.
Date of Authorship for this Version
May 2008
Keywords
Marbury v. Madison, American legal history, judicial review
Recommended Citation
Bilder, Mary Sarah, "Idea or Practice: A Brief Historiography of Judicial Review" (2008). Boston College Law School Faculty Papers. Paper 222.
http://lsr.nellco.org/bc_lsfp/222