Boston College Law School Faculty Papers
Title
Deportation and Justice: A Constitutional Dialogue
Document Type
Article
Comments
Boston College Law School Legal Research Series Paper No. 2000-13
Abstract
Recent statutory changes to the United States immigration law have resulted in a large increase in the number of lawful permanent resident noncitizens who are deported because of prior criminal conduct. Now, deportation is often a virtually automatic consequence of conviction for an increasingly minor array of crimes including possessory drug offenses and shoplifting. Under current statutory law, permanent resident noncitizens may be deported for crimes that were not grounds for deportation when they were committed and there may be no possibiilty of mercy or humanitarian relief. This Dialogue explores arguments for and against this system. Specifically, it examines the idea, rooted in history, that deportation is an unconstitutional punishment for criminal offenses.
Date of Authorship for this Version
July 2000
Keywords
immigration law, deportation, permanent resident noncitizens, criminal conduct, criminal offenses, conviction,
Recommended Citation
Kanstroom, Daniel, "Deportation and Justice: A Constitutional Dialogue " (2000). Boston College Law School Faculty Papers. Paper 114.
http://lsr.nellco.org/bc_lsfp/114